by Michael Crow, Wall Avenue Journal, June 20, 2025 (digital model)
Excerpts:
The administration’s actions this spring to terminate visas of worldwide college students for minor authorized infractions corresponding to visitors violations and its scrutiny of scholars’ social-media accounts have despatched a message that international college students aren’t wished right here.
And:
Joaquin Duato, CEO of Johnson & Johnson, and Ramon Laguarta, CEO of PepsiCo, had been pupil immigrants—each graduates of ASU’s Thunderbird Faculty of International Administration. Elon Musk, Peter Thiel, Sergey Brin (a Google co-founder), Satya Nadella (Microsoft CEO), and Indra Nooyi (a former CEO of PepsiCo) are among the many 1000’s of U.S. CEOs and founders who had been immigrants.
These expertise acquisitions add to U.S. financial success and innovation. Greater than 50% of all U.S. startups with greater than $1 billion in valuation have at the least one immigrant founder, lots of whom got here in as college students. The return for the U.S. is within the trillions of {dollars}.
by Veronique de Rugy, Motive, June 19, 2025.
Excerpts:
Emotion-based regulation is a harmful approach to regulate the advanced and dynamic U.S. financial system—except you occur to favor the lesser freedom and dynamism discovered on the European continent. Within the case of this U.S. rule, the federal government admits that it has no precise proof that two-person crews are safer than one-person crews. As a substitute, the company has requested the court docket to defer to what it calls a “commonsense product of reasoned decision-making.”
And:
The federal government’s personal information don’t help the notion that mandating two-person crews would enhance security. My former colleague Patrick McLaughlin confirmed that there isn’t a dependable, conclusive information to doc that one-person crews have worse security data than two-person crews. Many smaller U.S. railroads have lengthy operated safely with single-person crews, as do the Amtrak trains that haul Washington’s elite up and down the East Coast. We even have a wealth of knowledge from Europe and different nations the place single crew members function.
by Joe Lancaster, Motive, June 19, 2025.
Excerpts:
This week, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) launched new steering on “facility go to and engagement protocol for Members of Congress and employees.”
“ICE detention areas and Subject Places of work are safe services. As such, all guests are required to adjust to [identity] verification and safety screening necessities previous to entry,” it specified. “When planning to go to an ICE facility, ICE asks requests to be submitted at the least 72 hours upfront.”
By the way, it’s completely authorized for members of Congress to go to ICE detention services, even unannounced. And ICE’s try to avoid that requirement threatens the constitutional system of checks and balances.
And:
This isn’t uncharacteristic of the company: Earlier this yr, ICE brokers denied Motive‘s C.J. Ciaramella entry to an immigration court docket at a federal detention facility in Miami, in defiance of each federal regulation and steering listed on the company’s personal web site. (ICE later admitted the ability was “open day by day to the general public.”)
by David Friedman, David Friedman’s Substack, June 21, 2025.
Excerpt:
McArdle’s speak was a protection of the technique of which this was an instance, in her view a profitable one, the technique of buying and selling libertarian help for small wins, that being essentially the most that libertarians may anticipate to get in change. It’s a defensible technique however it occurred to me that there have been two prices neither of which she talked about.
The primary is to the status of the libertarian motion. The Libertarian Get together has lengthy labeled itself “The Get together of Precept;” a part of the attraction of the libertarian motion is the looks of constant help of liberty throughout all kinds of points, from drug legal guidelines to skilled licensing to immigration, of being motivated by a constant philosophy of freedom. If the social gathering is seen as visibly supporting Trump, as it will likely be by anybody who listened to McArdle’s webbed speak, it will likely be seen as sharing the duty for all of his actions, a few of them removed from libertarian. That may make it tougher to recruit or retain as members, of the motion in addition to the social gathering, anybody against Trump’s insurance policies. Since Trump will not be a libertarian that’s more likely to embody not solely anybody left of middle but in addition anybody significantly dedicated to libertarianism.
The second price is the impact of alliance with Trump, or with some other non-libertarian motion, on libertarian doctrine. Libertarians who’re Trump allies will really feel stress to attenuate the battle between his beliefs and theirs, to create libertarian defenses for unlibertarian insurance policies so as to not really feel obliged to assault their allies. That impact can be strengthened by the change within the personnel of the motion as Trump supporters be a part of, libertarians hostile to Trump’s insurance policies depart. In sufficient time the result’s more likely to be a “libertarian” social gathering, probably a “libertarian” motion, that’s not libertarian.