The Monetary Occasions has an article discussing the proposed tax on Chinese language ships that use US ports:
In 2024, about 46 per cent of US bulk fertiliser imports — 6.7mn metric tons — had been carried by Chinese language-built dry bulk carriers, in accordance with Kpler knowledge. A $1.5mn charge might improve transportation prices by $62.50 per ton, a burden that may doubtless be handed all the way down to farmers, already going through excessive enter prices. Phosphate and nitrogen fertilisers, important for US crop manufacturing, can be hit hardest. . . .
The urged charges are the results of a months-long investigation by US commerce officers, initiated by the Biden administration, into easy methods to counter China’s maritime dominance. The probe got here in response to complaints from union leaders about Chinese language business subsidies. Japan and Korea are additionally main builders, with American shipmakers extensively thought of gradual and costly as compared.
Why can’t US farmers merely move on this further value to the international customers of their exports? The issue they face is that the tax doesn’t apply to their rivals. Whereas the worldwide demand for farm items could also be considerably inelastic, the precise demand for US farm exports is way extra elastic, as importing nations have many different suppliers to select from:
Jay O’Neil, a commodities advisor, stated that the proposed charges “scare the heck out of me”, including that they quantity to “encouraging crop manufacturing expansions in lands of our international rivals”.