Welcome to a different chapter within the ever-entertaining saga of Florida insurance coverage regulation—the place the sudden is predicted, and actuality typically reads like satire. The most recent? Florida’s insurance coverage regulators are serving subpoenas on a critic who dared to highlight obvious points within the insurance coverage trade. Sure, you learn that proper. As a substitute of addressing the trade’s woes, they’ve determined to play a sport of “blame the messenger.”
The Tampa Bay Occasions article written by Lawrence Mower, Florida Regulators Challenge Subpoenas to Insurance coverage Trade Critic, uncovered this latest tactic and had me double-checking my inbox to see if my workplace had been subpoenaed, too. Right here’s the gist:
Weiss Scores, a Palm Seaside Gardens-based monetary scores company, just lately raised the alarm that Florida’s insurance coverage market is teetering on collapse. They backed it up with knowledge exhibiting insurers denying claims left and proper and shifting cash out of the state. However as an alternative of digging into these troubling developments, Florida regulators determined to demand Weiss’s emails, texts, and documentation. It’s like investigating the weatherman for predicting rain whereas ignoring the floodwaters rising round you.
The Actual Numbers: Why Weiss’s Report Hit a Nerve
Let’s check out the stats Weiss highlighted: Numbers that might make even probably the most seasoned regulator get away in hives:
- Farm Bureau Property & Casualty: Denying 70.5% of claims (Gold medalists in declare denials!)
- American Bankers Insurance coverage Firm: 51.2% denial charge (Silver medalists)
- Residents Property Insurance coverage: 50.4% denial charge (Bronze)
- Total development: Denial charges climbing from 24.9% in 2004 to 37.4% in 2023
These numbers aren’t simply alarming—they’re a flashing neon signal that claims, “One thing may be very, very unsuitable right here.” To be truthful, there could properly be legitimate explanations for a few of these elevated statistics, as I just lately said in A Frank Dialogue About Florida’s Insurance coverage Disaster, Together with Admissions About Why Present Claims Statistics Do Not Point out the Sky Is Falling.
Regulators’ Response: The Nice Subpoena Scavenger Hunt
As a substitute of investigating the insurers for these eye-popping denial charges, the regulators demanded Weiss produce:
- Emails about Florida’s insurance coverage market
- Texts associated to say denials
- Proof of insurers on the “brink of collapse”
- Proof of funds diverted to shareholders
- Documentation of insurers’ “Should you don’t prefer it, sue us” technique
Frankly, this method looks like making an attempt to repair a flat tire by yelling on the GPS.
What Regulators Ought to Be Investigating
Pricey Commissioner Yaworsky and Deputy Commissioner Parker, I would like you to achieve defending policyholders with nice protection at inexpensive costs and make sure insurers are absolutely and promptly paying claims. Whereas I love the creativity in your subpoenas, right here’s a suggestion: How about aiming your investigative prowess on the insurers themselves? Right here’s a starter listing:
- Inner memos on “loss ratio administration” methods
- Govt bonus plans tied to say denials
- Coaching manuals on “inventive” declare denials
- Correspondence about shifting reserves out of state
- Administration agreements and hidden revenue streams for executives
Oh, and let’s not neglect these PowerPoint displays on “Find out how to Pay Much less and Deny Extra.”
A Modest Proposal
Relatively than specializing in the individual holding the flashlight, why not look at the darkish corners of the trade? Think about:
- Subpoenaing claims knowledge and government communications
- Investigating reserve transfers and unexplained denials
- Exploring why denied claims usually get mysteriously paid after lawsuits
- Asking Residents why a 50.4% denial charge is appropriate
- Defending and searching for whistleblowers who expose unethical claims practices
These steps won’t be as thrilling as subpoenaing an trade critic, however they’d actually do extra to revive belief in Florida’s insurance coverage market.
Closing Ideas
Dr. Weiss summarized it completely: Florida’s insurance coverage trade isn’t on the point of a collapse—it’s already there within the minds of the general public. Floridians are shedding religion of their bought insurance coverage product, not due to dire predictions, however due to lived experiences: excessive deductibles, poor protection advantages, countless delays, denied claims, and an oversight system that’s extra targeted on optics than outcomes.
Commissioner Yaworsky, when you’d like assist drafting subpoenas to the parents really chargeable for this mess, my workplace is at your service—professional bono. Think about it a goodwill gesture towards fixing a system that’s failing thousands and thousands within the minds of most Floridians. There must be a higher attain for public enter and debate as a result of the general public is shedding religion of their potential to personal property on account of considerably expensive insurance coverage that doesn’t pay after a loss.
P.S. To any impartial adjusters who’ve spoken out concerning the wrongdoings of Florida’s claims trade and are studying this weblog: Save your emails, memos, and notes. If regulators proceed down this path, you possibly can be subsequent. And in the event that they ask you on your childhood diary, perhaps it’s time to name a lawyer.
Thought For The Day
“Nobody loves the messenger who brings dangerous information.”
—Sophocles