The end result of the presidential and congressional elections on Nov. 5 might have large implications for Okay-12 coverage and funding on the federal degree — and for firms working within the schooling market.
As presidential candidates, Kamala Harris and Donald Trump stand on reverse ends of the political spectrum on a lot of the vital faculty points which have emerged on the marketing campaign path.
About This Analyst
Reg Leichty is a co-founder of Foresight Legislation + Coverage, an schooling legislation agency in Washington D.C., the place he offers strategic recommendation, authorized counsel, and lobbying help to a broad vary of purchasers, together with schooling businesses and establishments, nonprofit organizations, and firms. Earlier in his profession, he served as telecommunications, expertise, and privateness counsel for former United States Senate Commerce, Science, and Transportation Committee Chairman Invoice Nelson of Florida, and as a senior legislative aide to former Senator Bob Kerrey of Nebraska.
And each chambers in Congress are up for grabs. Within the U.S. Home, the GOP controls 220 seats to Democrats’ 212 seats (with three vacancies), whereas within the Senate, Democrats have a slim majority.
A lot of large ticket federal objects — from funding for key Okay-12 packages reminiscent of Title I and Title II to the way forward for the U.S. Division of Training — may very well be decided by who’s elected in November.
“Each election issues lots for the schooling system,” mentioned Reg Leichty, who advises Okay-12 teams on federal funds and coverage as a founding companion at Foresight Legislation + Coverage. “This one is especially consequential on the presidential degree, given among the very divisive rhetoric concerning the public schooling system.”
The specter of cuts to federal funding for education schemes — multibillion-dollar packages that faculty districts rely closely on for important companies — looms based mostly on the result of the election.
Many schooling firms depend on faculty techniques with the ability to faucet into these funding streams with a purpose to pay for services in curriculum, evaluation, PD, ed tech, social-emotional studying, and lots of different areas.
The implications from the election additionally prolong past budgetary points to the likelihood that the federal authorities might turn out to be extra concerned in divisive political-culture debates which have roiled many faculty districts.
Regardless of the prevailing divisions, Leichty mentioned he’s considerably optimistic that lawmakers will put apart political variations and work collectively on education-related points, not less than in some areas.
EdWeek Market Transient spoke with Leichty about what schooling firms ought to count on from a Harris or Trump administration and shifting majorities in Congress, the prospect of bipartisanship on schooling subjects, and the way this November’s election will form different areas of presidency vital to the schooling trade.
This story is one in a collection that may take a look at the influence of the November elections on the schooling sector.
How do Harris and Trump differ on spending on large federal packages which might be vital to colleges and schooling firms?
It’s secure to say {that a} Trump administration would doubtless considerably disinvest in public schooling — and we have now a way of what a Trump schooling funds seems like. For instance, the lately handed Home Republican funds for the division of ed, the place we noticed an enormous lower to Title I, full elimination of ESEA Title II, and flat funding for Title IV.
Alternatively, a Harris administration is more likely to proceed to be strongly dedicated to offering assist for Title I for low-income communities, and in among the vital digital studying packages like Title IV that guarantee all college students have entry to the connectivity and linked units and different helps they should study.
Would you count on a Trump administration to enact main adjustments to the U.S. Division of Training?
Former President Trump himself has form of plainly mentioned that his focus in schooling shall be on dismantling the division of ed. We all know he has expressed a need to essentially alter the federal position in Okay-12 schooling. I might count on, as they did in the course of the Trump administration 4 years in the past, a heavy emphasis on selling entry to personal schooling, a concentrate on charters and different kinds of selection mechanisms. We’ve seen what their priorities are by way of the final administration and extra lately out on the marketing campaign path.
And the way do you count on a Harris administration would strategy the division of schooling?
We’d doubtless see Vice President Harris champion lots of the identical kinds of insurance policies that the Biden administration has targeted on the final 4 years. We’d see a continued dedication by a Harris workforce to reasonably priced school entry and completion.
We noticed on the Democratic Conference a spotlight and need to emphasise guaranteeing that college students have the employability abilities they have to be profitable. That features doubtlessly a concentrate on strengthening workforce packages, together with the federal apprenticeship packages that target abilities acquisition. And I do assume, as we’ve heard on the marketing campaign path, there can be a common dedication to public schooling, and the children which might be served by the general public faculty system.
Do you assume Trump would use his bully pulpit as president to stoke Okay-12 tradition wars over race and gender which have performed out in states and districts?
I do assume that President Trump’s rhetoric has gone all in on putting schooling on the middle of the tradition wars. If he have been elected, it’s doubtless that he’ll proceed to concentrate on the themes that divide fairly than convey folks collectively as communities to enhance public schooling. [In 2020, then-President Trump signed an executive order that sought to ban the use of “divisive concepts” in federal contracting. Various of that term were used in many states in efforts to restrict lessons on race and gender.]
There’s additionally the query of how do members on each side of the aisle that wish to transfer past a extra divisive debate about public schooling … come collectively to strengthen and higher serve the children in our communities that want essentially the most assist?
It’s in all probability going to stay a particularly divided Congress, post-election. How doubtless is it that bipartisan dealmaking might happen on faculty points?
There are members on each side of the aisle who’re deeply dedicated to public schooling. They worth the general public faculties of their communities. Many, if not most of them, are graduates of public faculties, and so they see the worth of it.
Regardless of a number of powerful, decisive conversations on the contrary what we’ve seen is that individuals who assist public schooling on each side of the aisle have come collectively over the past eight years. There’ve been some bumps within the street, however we’ve seen sturdy continued assist for guaranteeing that our public faculties stay type of anchor components of our communities.
Be a part of Us for EdWeek Market Transient’s Fall In-Individual Summit
Training firm executives and their groups don’t wish to miss EdWeek Market Transient’s Fall Summit, being held in-person in Denver Nov. 13-15. The occasion delivers unmatched market intel by way of panel discussions, unique information, and networking alternatives.
If Republicans win management of each chambers, what do you assume will occur with Okay-12 funding?
A Republican-controlled Congress is more likely to champion flat, or much less spending in public schooling. I believe the proof of that’s discovered within the U.S. Home Labor, Well being and Human Companies, Training and Associated businesses fiscal 12 months 2025 invoice that the committee accepted just a few weeks in the past, which cuts about $14 billion from Title I. That might be unprecedented.
May these deep cuts to Title I really occur?
It’s vital to do not forget that except Republicans obtain a super-majority within the Senate, that’s except they’ve 60 votes, it’ll proceed to be troublesome for these kinds of excessive cuts to be adopted. And I believe there are additionally many Republicans within the Senate that disagree with the path that the Home Republicans have taken on schooling spending.
All that’s to say, whereas schooling spending would unlikely be on a trajectory to extend in an all Republican Congress subsequent 12 months, it’s in all probability probably to be flat funded, as we’ve seen lately simply due to the issue of shifting deep cuts by way of a system that may undoubtedly nonetheless have a considerable variety of Senate Democrats and likewise Senate Republicans who should not pleasant to the sorts of deep cuts proposed by the Home Appropriations Committee this 12 months.
What do you count on to be a prime precedence for the following Home and Senate schooling committees?
The committees, truthfully in the event that they’re Republican or Democrat managed, will proceed to make progress on the substantive coverage problems with this Congress, which have been about modernizing the Workforce Innovation and Alternative Act, exploring updates to the Nationwide Apprenticeship Act, and seeking to discover a path towards increasing Pell Grant entry for shorter time period, top quality packages.
That’s to say members on each side of the aisle are going to be searching for bipartisan victories in what’s more likely to be a really intently divided Congress. What we’ve discovered this 12 months and final 12 months is that there’s a number of curiosity amongst Republicans and Democrats, and among the many Senate and Home, to attempt to replace the federal workforce packages. They’ve made a number of progress … in the direction of that objective.
On what different areas do you see prospects for compromise, and motion?
Considering from an ed-tech perspective, there’s some actually thrilling bipartisan provisions targeted on constructing out far more sturdy information infrastructure designed to advertise higher transparency for college students and employers within the workforce system. There’s some thrilling issues taking place, even in a troublesome type of political atmosphere.
Are there different areas of Okay-12 that might turn out to be major points for the following Congress?
Proper after the election there’ll doubtless even be another points which will come up on account of their prominence within the marketing campaign season. So there may very well be early conversations about proficiency challenges that children have skilled put up pandemic, and the steps which might be being taken to get all college students again on monitor.
There may very well be, within the Senate, an enormous concentrate on literacy on account of rating member Cassidy’s [U.S. Sen. Bill Cassidy, R-La.] curiosity and management in that area. I simply actually count on workforce to proceed to be a central focus of whichever social gathering is in energy.
Federal stimulus cash is expiring. To what diploma do you count on the following Congress to look at the extent to which these have been good investments?
We now have already seen the Home Training and Workforce Committee maintain these kinds of oversight hearings, which is a central a part of their position as a committee. That’s their job. It’s very doable that, for instance, if there’s a Republican majority within the Senate that we would see some hearings about ESSER within the well being committee [U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions] as effectively.
However I believe we’ve had that dialog principally already on account of the Republican majority within the Home. So sure, there may very well be some future hearings about ESSER, however I don’t count on it to be the dominant narrative of the following schooling committee’s work in the course of the subsequent Congress.
A Republican-controlled Congress is more likely to champion flat, or much less spending in public schooling.
Outdoors of the White Home and Congress, what different methods might the federal election have an effect on ed tech or Okay-12?
There are additionally questions of who the following president shall be which might be linked to issues like judicial appointments. For instance, in the previous few weeks the Fifth Circuit Courtroom of Appeals, which is closely populated by appointees of President Trump, has dominated that the income system for the Common Service Fund, together with E-Charge, is unconstitutional.
And we now have an actual query about the way forward for one of many —if not the largest — ed-tech program within the federal authorities, which is E-Charge. So this isn’t simply concerning the bully pulpit, and it’s not simply concerning the composition of the Congress and the way forward for laws. It’s additionally concerning the appointees of the president and the work they’re doing, and the appointment of judges that may have a dramatically completely different view concerning the constitutional relationship of a few of these packages.
On that word, the president appoints the chair of the Federal Communications Fee, which simply confirmed a fifth member final 12 months after a protracted partisan impasse. How might this election have an effect on the FCC?
If Trump wins, it’ll convert to a Republican majority and so they may need completely different views on issues like E-Charge, Wi-Fi on buses, or E-Charge assist for cellular hotspots. There are coverage points {that a} Trump FCC might train that is likely to be completely different and even dramatically completely different when it comes to how the E-Charge is used and what it’s used for and the way it’s funded.